Defending a build that opened Hurts/Saquon and later grabbed Joe Burrow at a post-ADP discount, The What said two early elite quarterbacks are "quite all right" in cumulative-scoring best-ball tournaments. He pointed to the 2023 regular-season BBM winner (Mathology) as proof that front-loading QB ceiling can juice weekly point totals, especially when both passers are stacked—Hurts with Barkley for goal-line TD correlation and Burrow with Tee Higgins. The What argued that locking in 50-point upside at the position frees drafters to embrace late-round chaos without worrying about a third quarterback, making the roster both flexible and high scoring through 14 weeks.

The What argued that Geno Smith is a glaring value in current best-ball rooms because drafters have not priced in the realistic scenario of Las Vegas trading for him. He framed it as an easy late QB pick that can be immediately stacked with Jacoby Myers, noting that "the market in the slappies do not respect Geno Smith with the Raiders." Given the earlier segment where he cited multiple beat-writer links between the Raiders and Smith, The What views the combo as a cheap way to capture an every-week starter tied to a narrow target tree. His advice: scoop Smith well after pick 150 and pair him with Myers for an inexpensive correlation that could pay off if the rumblings become reality.

After selecting him, The What assured listeners that Mark Andrews "will not stop rising to every occasion," calling him the rare tight end who thrives no matter what cards he’s dealt. He framed Andrews as a perennial red-zone alpha whose target share remains intact even when Baltimore’s passing volume dips, making him one of the few non-Travis Kelce tight ends worth paying up for in best-ball drafts. Despite last year’s late-season injury, The What believes Andrews’ combination of bankable volume and weekly spike-week potential still justifies his third-round price tag.

The What mocked the idea that J.K. Dobbins will matter in Denver, noting the running back "doesn’t have much of an Achilles left" after last year’s rupture. He expects Sean Payton to bench Dobbins at the first missed blitz pickup in favor of Jaleel McLaughlin or rookie Audric Estime. With Payton’s short leash and a crowded committee, The What sees Dobbins as little more than an injury-prone camp body whose best-ball appeal vanished the moment he signed in Denver.

The What said Zach Charbonnet is strictly an insurance policy who "will never see the field as a starter without an injury." His logic is that Ken Walker owns every high-leverage early-down and goal-line snap and Seattle clearly views Charbonnet as a change-of-pace back. He even mentioned the Seahawks are "waiting on Damian Martinez"—a 2025 power back prospect—to handle true workhorse duties, further capping Charbonnet’s future ceiling. In best-ball terms, The What thinks burning a mid-round pick on Charbonnet is a wasted roster spot unless you’re specifically betting on a Walker injury.

The What hyped Tony Pollard as a priority pick, labeling him “the grown-ass man whose yams never stop moving.” He believes Pollard’s contract incentives will keep the coaching staff funneling high-leverage touches—especially red-zone carries—his way all season, even if ankle or knee flare-ups crop up. The What added that Dallas’ offensive line remains a strength, giving Pollard clean lanes to cash in those incentive-driven opportunities. Despite general market concern over last year’s efficiency dip, he trusts volume tied to money-based milestones and views Pollard as the kind of RB anchor who can inject needed “soul and juice” into a wide-receiver-heavy best-ball build.

Brandon The What pushed back against the consensus that Pittsburgh will be a bottom-tier team, predicting the Steelers could win 11 games and make the playoffs. He framed it as a "perfect storm" where widely-disliked figures—Aaron Rodgers (a hypothetical late-season addition or trade target), new OC Arthur Smith, and an allegedly overrated Mike Tomlin—end up grinding out ugly victories that anger the public. Brandon’s thesis is rooted in Tomlin’s perennial .500 floor and the market’s tendency to overreact when everyone agrees a roster is doomed, creating value on Pittsburgh’s win-total over and long-shot playoff tickets.

The What urged drafters not to get swept up in the narrative that Ben Johnson will instantly fix Chicago. He is "not a Caleb Williams guy," saying the rookie holds the ball too long, misses easy throws, and is less accurate than advertised. Layering that skepticism onto a franchise he views as chronically mis-managed, he prefers pivoting to other mid-round quarterback targets—citing Jordan Love as a safer bet—and is fading early Bears stacks (Williams, DJ Moore, Rome Odunze) until their price reflects the uncertainty.

The What revealed that his highest overall exposure across all contests is Rico Dowdle at 20% and that Isaac Guerendo is close behind. His philosophy is simple: once you reach the double-digit rounds, swing for pure upside by targeting backup running backs who could inherit full workloads if injuries strike. He argued the opportunity cost is minimal that late, while the payoff—landing a mid-season starting RB—can vault a best-ball roster. Dowdle’s status as the direct Ezekiel Elliott replacement in Dallas and Guerendo’s explosive athletic profile make them ideal lottery tickets in his eyes.

The What dismissed the idea of drafting Rashee Rice at the 2-3 turn, saying, “I don’t like a second-round Rice, come on, bud.” His stance is that the price ignores both the volatility of Kansas City’s target tree and the legal uncertainty still hanging over Rice, making the opportunity cost of a top-24 pick unjustifiable in best-ball formats.